« Average price paid is trending downwards, CD buyers still volunteer to pay $1 more | Main | DAC Crowell Interview »

November 25, 2005

Comments

Jay

But if a podcast were "commercial but WEALTHY" (assuming such podcasts exist) then wouldn't this mean a lot of listeners actually PAY to subscribe to the podcast...and since they are paying listeners, they might also be inclined to PAY for a Magnatune CD if the liked it? (either that or they have so many subscribers that ad revenues are the reason they generate over 50K...in that case they must have a huge audience)

What would happen if, by some wild fluke, a major commercial radio station decided they wanted to play Magnatune songs instead of just the typical RIAA (de facto payola) songs? What type of licensing would be involved? (not that I predict this will happen in near future )

John Buckman

What would happen if, by some wild fluke, a major commercial radio station...

Radio stations don't need a license from us to play our music, they already pay a blanket license to ASCAP or BMI (in the USA) which gives them legal permission to play anything they like without additional fees. That's a USA government law.

Now, if a podcast were really making a lot of money, we'd charge a license for them to use the music, just as if a film wanted to use our music. Yes, we would get advertising out of the use, but I do think that not everything should be free for everyone -- that's why I drew the line at $50k per year in gross profits for "commercial podcast but free".

It's all moot now anyway, as no podcasts are that profitable, so the currentl commercial-but-poor license is just a way to promote our music in podcasts, however those podcasts work.

-john

Charlie

FYI - I think this predates your example here by a few months (May 2005):

http://www.jmcardle.com/wordpress/?p=5

The download:
http://www.jmcardle.com/wordpress/?page_id=3

Dave

John,

I did a videoblog entry that was actually borderline journalistic and I used Magnatune music. It preceded Pete's entry (a friend of mine!) but not the one referenced by Charlie.

http://www.ourmedia.org/node/77601

I like your clarification of non-commercial and commercial-but-poor. I'm in the situation where I take sponsor money but consider my podcast non-commercial since I've never returned any of that money to my pocket. I use it for server expenses and equipment expenses and conference expenses. In September I gave a big chunk of my surplus to Gulf Coast relief charities. I use things licensed Creative Commons non-commercial and I've always wondered if some day I'll have to respond to a challenge of that by a license holder since I do generate revenue.

Mick I

This guy here has been using this music for a while.

http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/videoblog/

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.