A new idea this week, that I'd like feedback on.
I want to write a book titled "How to Overthrow the Music Industry"
It would be given away for free, and would explain a) why the present system is evil b) what you personally can do to replace the current system with a better alternative.
Tips would include telling local bands about alternatives they have to bad record deals, mentioning the bad stuff the industry does and the positive alternatives on web forums and discussion lists, volunteering to sell band's own CDs, etc.
It would not be magnatune-only focussed, but rather generally give people the tools to help the industry transformation.
I've talked to Steve of WeedShare about participating in the book (some pro-weedshare tips: put your favorite weedified artists music on your own web site, blog or podcast, spread weedified files via ethical p2p networks) and Derek from CDBABY also would like to participate (once he finishes the CDBABY site rewrite in a few months).
Our goal would be to get people involved in helping companies like Magnatune succeed. Would make a great handout at conferences like CMJ.
Another possibility is having the book available for purchase at Amazon, and/or print-on-demand at lulu.com.
How big does it need to be? A book or a booklet?
A book gives more depth for people already interested in the "music industry is evil" theme. A booklet could be more widely distributed, both in print and online. PDF download featured on Magnatune, Weedshare and CDBABY, and possibly other music businesses interested in joining a united front.
About the title, I think there should be a subtitle. In reality, you don't just want to overthrow the music business in the sense of destroying it: you want to overthrow the dominant players and replace them with better business models.
This is not quite right, but to give you the jist:
How to Overthrow the Music Industry
- and make music thrive...
Posted by: Nathan Jones | September 24, 2005 at 04:03 AM
totally, John, go for it! I think the world needs such a book.
Posted by: Cameron Reilly | September 25, 2005 at 10:51 PM
I had the same idea that it needs a subtitle too. My ideas are:
without killing music
or
but treat musicians fairly
or (too long really)
making sure that musicians can still earn money
Posted by: Paul Morriss | September 26, 2005 at 06:01 AM
Please answer me this question: I'm familiar with ethical sites and trackers, but what is an ethical P2P network? As far as I know most P2P network technology can be abused by bad people in the same way that VCR's could be abused to steal movies.
(Most P2P sites I participate in share only unavailable/non-copyright music -- you wouldn't believe the discussions on sampling music from 78 rpm records/wax cylinders, but the P2P protocols we use could be abused by people stealing the latest Hollywood movie...)
The book sounds like a good idea, John. As you say, you don't want to destroy/overthrow; you want to force a (bleh jargon) paradigm shift.
Posted by: Chris | September 28, 2005 at 11:02 PM
One thing that must be kept in mind are the inherent power of the record labels. Between the RIAA and their alliance with Clearchannel, Infinity, and Viacom, musicians are not aware of what ground exactly they have left to promote their music. With turnouts at venues being as weak as they are in some areas, such as my former city, Cleveland, artists are no longer sure how they can make a living from their music without labels.
As an independent artist it is my goal to demonstrate to the world that (a) the internet is a feasible tool for artists to publicise themselves, and (b) it is possible to live without being signed to a major label. When I receive my Bachelor's of Philosophy my major will have been on "Using Music to Influence Society."
Quality inherently possesses stronger force connotations than quantity, but the music industry, with its monopoly of Billboards, lawyers, radio stations, and indeed semiotic representation, has no need for quality--that's where Magnatune and independent artists step in.
It's outrageous that artists are only getting 7-8 points per album, and it's outrageous that the internet and peer-to-peer networks have been black listed as "illegal". With power to define following money, the record labels have had the luxury of defining and regulating the legality of acquiring music.
This 'paradigm' which has been semioticallly constructed is not easy to overthrow as its weight is largely cultural, and not individual. Sociologically, however, if the myths of power can be overcome and cognitive dissonance eschewed for sake of, yes, a paradigm shift, inevitably the labels will crumble as the paradigm under which they exist would no longer possess validity.
If the book could be written convincingly, without coming off sounding like a tool for self-publicity, its gravity could sway a number of artists and labels into "modernization"-- that is, with a greater focus to the artists. At its worst, the tool could simply be a propaganda tool of Magnatune.com and an effort to create publicity for what the major labels might refer to as a "post-mortem medium of product distribution."
This said, I would encourage you to write it.
Posted by: Chris Feran | October 10, 2005 at 08:52 AM
If you are interested in alternative thinking about the music biz, check out this daily podcast. The attempt is to educate and that seems to be the best way to help stop the madness in the music business.
http://www.musicianscast.com
Posted by: Peter Bowman | July 12, 2006 at 04:14 AM